After her discussion of the principles, Kenney speaks of one of the many ideas librarians and archivists have begun to realize of digitizing special collections. This idea is the creation of social digital communities to help the digitization process, using tools of the Web 2.0 generation. The Institute of Museums and Library Services (link) gives out grants that help with digitizing Special Collections. One of the 2009 grants was given to the University of California, Santa Cruz to digitize their Grateful Dead Archive and make it available on the Web. One of the hopes for this endeavor is that the fans of the Grateful Dead, the “Deadhead” community, will then create a digital community to contribute to this archive. This will allow the creation of a fuller archival preservation. Would other archives benefit from such a venture?
Kenney then explains that “mass digitization of special collections and online access can lead to mass consumption” and speaks of Cornell University, her affiliation, which has provided access to digital archives to people who are unaffiliated with the university. She explains that many users appreciate and use the open access archives, people with many different backgrounds and reasons for the usage. The question then becomes how many resources and how much attention should the institution pay to those users who are not affiliated with that university or library? Is there a line of “openness” that libraries, archives and universities should not cross? How will Web 2.0 and social communities change that line of open access?
Kenney, A. (2009) The Collaborative Imperative: Special Collections in the Digital Age. Research Library Issues: A Bi-Monthly Report from ARL, CNL, and SPARC. 267. 20-29. Retrieved from Publications of ARL (link)
Rappaport, S. (2009) UC Santa Cruz Receives $615,000 Grant to Digitize Grateful Dead Archive. Retrieved from http://news.ucsc.edu/2009/09/3237.html
The digitization of special collections and archival material is very exciting to me. It is close to my heart after working several years in my university’s rare book room. Apart from all of the benefits listed in your post, there are several others that I see just from my experience. First being that it provides an alternative access for those that are intimidated by the rules and regulations of the special collections room. I can’t tell you how many students made a speedy exit as soon as they realized they could not check out a book, or how nervous they looked their first time in, having their every move so closely watched.
ReplyDeleteAlso, one of the more difficult aspects of working with rare, valuable, delicate, and expensive materials is balancing the preservation of those materials, while wanting the patrons to be able to use and experience them. Digitization provides a way to allow unlimited access to the materials without damaging them.
Good point, the reference rooms can be intimidating. Allowing students to access to digitized copies creates the ability for students to spend unlimited time with the material, making it more useful to them.
ReplyDelete